In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court of India has clarified that Cabinet decisions announced through press releases are not legally enforceable until they are formally codified through statutory or regulatory instruments. This verdict, delivered by a three-judge bench comprising Justices B.R. Gavai, Prashant Kumar Mishra, and K.V. Viswanathan, underscores the importance of procedural rigor in converting policy announcements into law.
Case Background: Nabha Power vs. PSPCL
The case stemmed from a dispute between Nabha Power Limited, a subsidiary of L&T Power Development, and Punjab State Power Corporation Limited (PSPCL) regarding a 2009 press release on India’s Mega Power Policy. On October 1, 2009, the Union Cabinet announced changes to this policy, including customs duty exemptions for eligible projects, through a press release. Nabha Power claimed that it relied on this announcement to calculate its project bid, arguing it should retain the associated fiscal benefits. However, PSPCL countered that these changes only became legally binding with subsequent notifications in December 2009, asserting that Nabha Power was obligated to pass these benefits on to them.
Key Legal Questions
The case brought up important questions about what constitutes “law” and when policy changes become enforceable. Nabha Power argued that the Cabinet’s decision, even if shared through a press release, should be treated as law under the terms of the Power Purchase Agreement (PPA). PSPCL, however, maintained that a formal notification was required to meet the legal standards set by the Customs Act and make the changes official.
Supreme Court’s Ruling
Writing for the bench, Justice K.V. Viswanathan ruled in favor of PSPCL, affirming that a press release alone does not constitute “law.” The Court highlighted that laws must be enacted with formal announcements to be enforceable, emphasizing that, “Certainty is the hallmark of law. It is one of its essential attributes and an integral component of the rule of law.”
In this ruling, the Court found that the customs exemption only took effect on December 11, 2009, with the corresponding policy amendment on December 14, 2009. Therefore, Nabha Power was required to pass these benefits to PSPCL, adhering to the terms outlined in the PPA.
Broader Implications
This ruling reiterates the importance of procedural formality in converting government policy into actionable law. The Court also dismissed Nabha Power’s argument for promissory estoppel, explaining that an enforceable promise must be explicit and legally binding, which a press release does not achieve on its own.
A Decision for Clarity in Law
This verdict will have a lasting impact on policy implementation, emphasizing that government intentions, no matter how clearly stated in press releases, must go through proper legislative channels to have binding power. The Supreme Court’s decision safeguards the certainty and stability of law—principles that ultimately serve both public and private interests by ensuring all stakeholders have a clear understanding of what is legally binding.
Advotalks: Talk To Lawyers https://www.advotalks.com/
For More Legal Updates visit our youtube channel
